Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether can the Internet relplace classroom teachers. Whereas some group of people says that Internet can replace the classroom teachers, I sanguinely believe that It can not. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that classroom teaching provides a good environment, which the internet class can't provide. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that students with the classroom training perform better than the student who opted for an online class. Thus, beneficial ramifications of classroom training apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that online classes provide the anywhere access to students which will eventually replace the formal classroom training. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is one-side view. Internet class does not provide the proper environment for study. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of classroom training far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of classroom study prove its significance, but also pinpoints the implications of online classes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambi...
^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...d environment, which the internet class cant provide. According to my own experience...
^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rently can be seen. On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that online classes ...
^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the proper environment for study. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive...
^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the preconceived notion. To conclude, while there are several compelling argum...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5474137931 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86175411126 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633620689655 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8353706232 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259312206087 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883192468059 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072545540094 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143198504716 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728546031584 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.