Companies top level authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss.
One of the most conspicuous trend of contemporary work force is employees input. Employees in organisations want to be heard and contribute towards success.
Although, some expertise believe higher managers should be the one making decisions, others disagree with this notion. This essay will discuss, higher managers should be the once’s making final calls, and why employees opinions should be treated with suspicion.
Firstly, higher managers judge a situation at work though there experience and knowledge. They have huge responsibility of companies reputation and success, on their shoulders. Managers need to keep an eye on the budget as well as have a keen sense of project success or failure. Higher managers also need to hold companies value and work within the guidelines to maintain companies work culture in alliance with companies success, which can only come from choosing what’s beneficial and nonprofitable for the company. Hence, it can be said higher managers should be trusted with decision making.
Secondly, unlike high officials employees lack experience. Some employees make judgement based on personal satisfaction and not group as a whole. Considering opinions from an inexperienced employees can have detrimental effects on companies progress, and give rise to disagreements, unhealthy work environment, strain manager and employees relationship and ultimately result in loss. Employees should follow higher managers footsteps to avoid downfall. Therefore it can be said, taking suggestions from less experienced employees can have negative consequences.
To conclude, this essay discussed why higher managers should be making decisions with there knowledge and experience, and inexperienced employees can hinder companies progress. In my opinion, higher managers should be responsible for making final decision.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 190, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'employee'?
Suggestion: employee
...sidering opinions from an inexperienced employees can have detrimental effects on compani...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 454, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...r managers footsteps to avoid downfall. Therefore it can be said, taking suggestions from...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 6.10837438424 262% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88518518519 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04867913111 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.6851851371 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3125 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206709537939 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753208999957 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506235566677 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126190182017 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513915771636 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.1260098522 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 190, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'employee'?
Suggestion: employee
...sidering opinions from an inexperienced employees can have detrimental effects on compani...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 454, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...r managers footsteps to avoid downfall. Therefore it can be said, taking suggestions from...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 6.10837438424 262% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88518518519 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04867913111 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.6851851371 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3125 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206709537939 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753208999957 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506235566677 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126190182017 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513915771636 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.1260098522 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.