Company top level authorities should or should not take employee suggestions or ideas to take any decisions.
Companies success is aloof if it’s employees pitchin for company success with dedication and hard work. Most companies give their employees all the tools for their personal and professional goals. Although some argue, when making final call companies should discard employees input, and only high ranking officers should be the one making final calls. This essay will discussed companies should accept all suggestions with open arms, however, experience employees should be allowed to make the decision, in the end.
Firstly, organisation thrive if it’s employees are satisfied and feel liberated. Vast proportion of genius business ideas come from within company employees. For instance, company survey on business expansion ideas can accumulate new ways of approaching clients. Which will ultimately benefit and expand business success possibilities. Hence, we can say employees input can take organisation to high success level.
Secondly, high ranking officers are biggest assets of a company. They generally have more experience than some employees and can put their knowledge and experience to great use. For example, managers can almost predict if a new proposal in business will be favourable for company or not. Mangers can evaluate with their experience and make last call while alinging with companies values in mind. Therefore we can say, high level authorities can save organisation from loss.
To conclude, this essay discussed how initiative from employees can bring success to company and high ranking officers can make final choice. In my opinion, top level authorities should be the one making the final decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'discuss'
Suggestion: discuss
...one making final calls. This essay will discussed companies should accept all suggestions...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 33, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the biggest'.
Suggestion: are the biggest
...l. Secondly, high ranking officers are biggest assets of a company. They generally hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rience and make last call while alinging with companies values in mind. Therefore...
^^
Line 6, column 398, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...linging with companies values in mind. Therefore we can say, high level authorities can ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 6.10837438424 295% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.612 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70090059054 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7423902973 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.6875 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26158353092 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845451972593 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068626880175 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159785718934 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631445473543 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.