Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packing of products? Give your view or any relevant example with your own experience.
The effect of over packaging of products, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of over packaging of products has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on environment in recent years. It is agreed that both consumer and producer should avoid extra packaging of products. This essay will elaborate why customer is accountable for over packaging of products and why producers should reduce unnecessary packing and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why avoiding over packaging of products is a duty of the customers, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that the materials used for packaging adds to the environmental pollution to a great extent. As an illustration, snacks and other food items packed in eye-catchy packs have been consumed in a large scale by people. These packets are highly difficult to dispose as they emit poisonous gas if burnt and if not can be seen to contaminate the water somewhere. Therefore, the consumers should substitute those products with the less packed ones when shopping.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that the duty of producers in over packaging products is also significant as there are innumerable reasons for that but the most salient one is that all the packaging costs are directly being added to the product prices. In fact, real product qualities, a concern of the customers, cannot be presented in a large container and packet while such packaging costs may increase the product prices. Therefore, the producer should be aware of the cost of product and focus on the product quality.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the responsibility of the consumer for avoiding over packaging of products is prominent, although the role of the producer in limiting extra packets should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, in fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 317.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16088328076 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86757208772 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536277602524 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.2812289 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.333333333 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294656186722 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124900902243 0.0925447433944 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692810740786 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194840646298 0.151781067708 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159006085922 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.