Do you think the school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theatre centuries ago?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend by the prodigies discussing the importance of inclusion of old dramas and work theaters in school academia. Some people think that studying of plays and theater works should be included in academic curriculum, while others maintain that they are aa total wastage of time. This essay will discuss the importance of plays, dramas and theaters in academic curriculum.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated in favour of dramas, plays theaters to be an integral and important part of academic curriculum. Firstly, participation in dramas, plays and theater work would allow the students to come across and have an insight about various lifestyles and civilizations in different eras. For instance, plays of Shakespeare helps student to understand the meaning of life in his time frame. As a matter of fact, the importance of plays, dramas and theater works cannot be overruled.
On the other hand, proponents of the view that participation in literary activities is nothing but just a wastage of time are not cognizant with their true meaning. Therefore, involvement in dramas and theater works not only broadens the horizon of students but also boosts their confidence level and various personality traits. As an example, students interested in acting can only flourish their skills by active participation in dramas and plays. As a result, the importance of inclusion of literary activities in academic curriculum is quite evident.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds the view that old plays and theater works should be obligatory part of every academic curriculum as they provide students a better understanding of ancient human civilizations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38461538462 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96375253918 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534798534799 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3985159055 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254326042918 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097217662077 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483007950919 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163955663422 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435939139479 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.