Over the past few years, technologies has rapidly grown, people uses the internet and video communication every their everyday life. From communicating with friends and family to doctors video communication has been widely used. This has multiple pros and cons. This essay will discuss the both of the side and then deduce a logical conclusion.
On the contrary, conspicuously, there are myriads of reasons to support the pros of the video communication but on of the most compelling reason is that it saves a lot of time. Furthermore, video communication made it easy for the people to connect with there doctors from any where in the world. For example, if a person is travelling around the word but, in between he find himself in some heath problem and need to contact with his doctors, by using the video communication he can contact his doctor from any part of the world.
At the outset, there are some cons too of using the video communication as when using the video communiction doctors may not sence the real situation. This can lead to the doctors dignose the patients incorrectly, which may further impact the patient health.
To conclude, after analyzing the above facts I would like to recapitulate that eventhough the video communication has great advantages but, it should be used in the only situlation where for patient it is imposible to vist the doctors other than that the visit to doctor should be give the preference over video communication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...the pros of the video communication but on of the most compelling reason is that i...
^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...ople to connect with there doctors from any where in the world. For example, if a person ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'between the find'?
Suggestion: between the find
...n is travelling around the word but, in between he find himself in some heath problem and need ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
...ling around the word but, in between he find himself in some heath problem and need ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96761133603 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85434576464 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566801619433 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.3836255156 50.4703680194 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.7 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33512740164 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133063535155 0.0925447433944 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702884782616 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198045585958 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344576240862 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 55.0591133005 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.