The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do u think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual?
These days, there are a controversial debate among people about the environment’ various problems. There are a great number of people who interpret the impact of governments activities as thoroughly constructive, while other hold an opponent ‘s view. I elucidate my point of view by analyzing both sides of issue.
It is argued that government’s regulations to solve environmental problems play a pivotal role in creating adroit people, this is attributed to the fact that such activities could foster the climate changes and environmental problem in society, therefore they would create a feeling of accomplishment and competence, which consequently open avenues to new achievements so individuals enthusiasm and determination will be amplified toward many daunting tasks, Paris agreement for example, developing countries have to do uphill struggle to solve environmental issues.
On the other hand, it is claimed that individuals should be encouraged to use public transportation, which could decrease traffic and tackle congested road, this is to say that public transportation could decrease the air pollution. Specifically, a research conducted by Yale university in 2015 found that individuals could declined usage of fossil fuel across the globe.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propound the view that both individual and governments are responsible for decreasing air pollution. This is expected governments take cognizance of these fact and began to adopt these way of assistance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ret the impact of governments activities as thoroughly constructive, while other...
^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the impact of governments activities as thoroughly constructive, while other hol...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...tly open avenues to new achievements so individuals enthusiasm and determination will be am...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'decline'
Suggestion: decline
...ty in 2015 found that individuals could declined usage of fossil fuel across the globe. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fact' or 'these facts'?
Suggestion: this fact; these facts
...expected governments take cognizance of these fact and began to adopt these way of assista...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this way' or 'these ways'?
Suggestion: this way; these ways
...izance of these fact and began to adopt these way of assistance.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8125 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43433295665 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665178571429 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 151.997327279 50.4703680194 301% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 162.75 104.977214359 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.9669160288 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.25397266985 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164219166731 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546119863532 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458621760302 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815444532102 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319556897488 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.