The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems so who do you think responsible for solving it? Is it the government, organisation or each individual?
The importance of environment in danger, which was debatable has now become controversial. The substantial influence of of environment problems has sparked the controversy over potential impact of the trend on solving the environment issue. It can be said that government, organisation and individuals should work collaboratively to solve this issue. This essay will elaborate problem effecting the environment and how government, organisations and individuals can work together and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why our environment is in danger, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that, population growth has raised various demands. Example for instance, US population census results suggest that increasing demand for housing have resulted in deforestation, people have become more vehicle dependent, which causes in air pollution. Additionally, production of goods on a large scale, causes industrial pollution and greenhouse gases results in negative externalities. Furthermore, environment is in danger due to human activities.
Another reason why government, organisation and individuals must analysed the issue of environment in danger is to have pollution free environment and work collaboratively in taking appropriate steps to overcome environment issues. For instance, government should implement stricter environmental laws, organisation should adopt proper recycling practices and individuals should avoid buying over packed products. Based on that it can be agreed that environment danger can be controlled if there were enough collaboration.
In conclusion, approaches to deal with problems of environment are numerous, but the most effective one is that government should take more responsibility of saving the environment by imposing stricter environmental laws, which is not impractical and unattainable but comprehensible and feasible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...ontroversial. The substantial influence of of environment problems has sparked the co...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...S population census results suggest that increasing demand for housing have resul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 33.0 5.75862068966 573% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04744525547 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46251899274 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576642335766 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2481592767 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.083333333 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273176711255 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102962168112 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053516267745 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157448457834 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553514333418 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.11 11.5310837438 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.