Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of ambivalence over this matter, whether the foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when visiting the cultural and historical attractions in the country. Whereas some people agree with this thought, I sanguinely disagree. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that keeping the fee the same for both will attract more visitor. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an experiment, which revealed that the same fee for both local and foreign visitor attracts more foreign visitors to the country. Thus, the beneficial ramification of keeping the same fee for both apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that foreign visitor should be charged more to earn more money. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. As a tangible example, researchers from a reputed organization conducted research which revealed that charging foreign visitors the same as local improve country reputation. Hence, it is correct to presume a preconceived notion of skeptics.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of charing local and foreign visitors the same far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the benefits of same charges prove its significance, but also pinpoints implications of charging foreign visitor differently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37254901961 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82564191126 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572549019608 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4409105959 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.166666667 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207516652228 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780190086087 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539167725596 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130421749656 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621967598188 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.