Illiterate of future would not be one who does not know to read, but people who do not know how to learn.

Essay topics:

Illiterate of future would not be one who does not know to read, but people who do not know how to learn.

One of the conspicuous trend of today’s ear is keeping up with the changing world. We are living in a tech savvy society. Expertise believe, in this era of constant new technological invention, literates of future will be the one who can learn new things and not merely read. This essay will discuss, to keep up with the fast pace tempo, feeble ways are not conducive and one must unlearn and relearn, in order to survive in this technologically advanced world.

Firstly, traditional way of doing things are outdated. In this digital era there has been been tremendous changes. For example, mobile phone replacing land lines. Not only it’s is the fastest way of communication, but also have versatile features which makes communication easier and faster. Therefore, it can be said, one need to get out of their comfort zone and experience things practically.

Secondly, we constantly learn new things throughout our lives. With influx of new invention one need to learn new ways and update their knowledge to keep up with the current trends. For instance, comparison between sending electronic email and posting letters, one is received instantly and other takes weeks. Hence, it can be said an individual may struggle if they can’t learn new trends of this fast paced world.

To conclude, this essay discussed, why merely reading is not enough to be productive in this era and how learning new ways of doing things can be efficient. In my opinion, I agree that Illiterate of future would not be one who does not know to read, but people who do not know how to learn.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: been
...outdated. In this digital era there has been been tremendous changes. For example, mobile...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...gs throughout our lives. With influx of new invention one need to learn new ways and update t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91821561338 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73603422487 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587360594796 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.429124892 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 2.91625615764 309% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325837721241 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106961840193 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.212863952774 0.071462118173 298% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228928350712 0.151781067708 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.243446462987 0.0609392437508 399% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.