Illiterate of future would not be one who does not know to read, but people who do not know how to learn.
One of the conspicuous trend in today’s ear is invention in every aspect of life. Keeping up with new inventions and learn the new ways, and forget feeble ways can be daunting preposition. Expertise believe, in this era of constant new invention, literates of future will be the one who can learn new things and not merely read. This essay will discuss, how reading is not sufficient and one need to constantly update their knowledge to keep up with the changes.
Firstly, traditional way of doing things are outdated, especially when we are living in a digital era. There has been tremendous changes as to how people did things in past and currently. For example, mobile phone replacing land lines. Reading about mobile phone will not improve operating a mobile phone. One will need to indulge themselves in re-learning and in practical way. Therefore, it can be said reading is not enough, one need to get out of their comfort zone and experience things practically.
Secondly, we constantly learn new things throughout our lives. Human brain is blessed, in a way that it can process new information and work with it. Similarly, with influx of new invention one need to learn new ways and update their knowledge to keep up with the current trends. For instance, comparison between sending electronic email and posting letters, one is received instantly and other takes weeks. Hence, it can be said an individual may struggle if they can’t learn new ways of doing things.
To conclude, this essay discussed, why merely reading is not enough to be productive in this era and how learning new ways of doing things can be efficient. In my opinion, I agree that Illiterate of future would not be one who does not know to read, but people who do not know how to learn.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ertise believe, in this era of constant new invention, literates of future will be the one wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...work with it. Similarly, with influx of new invention one need to learn new ways and update t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y reading is not enough to be productive in this era and how learning new ways of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 6.10837438424 278% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 306.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83006535948 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6547616482 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52614379085 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3368630467 50.4703680194 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9411764706 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 2.91625615764 343% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347290895341 0.242375264174 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116989252376 0.0925447433944 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.196479396537 0.071462118173 275% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260595785576 0.151781067708 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.226245197918 0.0609392437508 371% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.5310837438 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.