Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples.
These days, there is a controversial debate among people about the replacing large malls with small shops. There are a great number of people who interpret the impacts of this developing as thoroughly constructive, while others hold an opponent view. In this essay, I elucidate my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.
It is argued that providing large shopping malls in cities could tackle congested roads and decrease unemployment rate so this play a pivotal role in creating adroit people. This is attributed to the fact that such retail stores could relive the density of people in the street and buyer have a wide range of affordable commodities, therefore, they would create a feeling of accomplishment and competence which consequently open avenues to new achievements so that buyer s’ enthusiasm and determination will be amplified towards many daunting activities. Apple store, for example, establishing showrooms around the world would lead to decrease unemployment and foster well-being.
On the other hand, there are a number of people who hold a different view and say that it is claimed that some measures can be taken by government to stimulate local people to purchase more goods from small shops and leaders of a country should stabilize economy and welfare of unprivileged region by expanding these shop centers, which would instill strong feeling of self-esteem in youngsters so that they are more likely to perform up to expectations in society. Specifically, a research study conducted by Yale University in 2015 has found that small shops could enhance a buyer’s intellectual ability to make decisions related to social and personal life.
In conclusion, this foregoing discussion propounds the view that although large shopping malls have enormous benefits for modern society, they can devastate the small shops. It is expected that governments take cognizance of this fact and they should adopt new planning regulations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple. This is attributed to the fact that such retail stores could relive the dens...
^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...live the density of people in the street and buyer have a wide range of affordabl...
^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t and competence which consequently open avenues to new achievements so that buye...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se unemployment and foster well-being. On the other hand, there are a number of...
^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent view and say that it is claimed that some measures can be taken by government...
^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to purchase more goods from small shops and leaders of a country should stabiliz...
^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ong feeling of self-esteem in youngsters so that they are more likely to perform ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 312.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35897435897 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95002061527 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612179487179 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.5024630542 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.775366967 50.4703680194 241% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.2 104.977214359 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2 20.9669160288 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9 7.25397266985 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225806231197 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964438220474 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105290594653 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144160541164 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700970623009 0.0609392437508 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.3980295567 138% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.