Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not?
The importance of law in changing human behaviour, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of law on human behaviour has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on society in recent years. It can be agreed that law can change man’s actions to some extent. This essay will elaborate both positive and negative effects of law and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are various reasons why law can alter people’s manners, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that imposing punishments for misconducting can force people to behave in the right way. For instance, if people know they could be imprisoned as littering, they will keep their surroundings clear. Furthermore, heavy punishments of law are always the tool of government to protect the order of society, which is usually improved year by year. Therefore, law plays a vital role not only in obeying the man to behave rightly but also in the government’s monitoring methods.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of law on human actions, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that law cannot change a person’s nature. As an illustration, there are still a large number of extremely serious criminals such as drug smugglers and terrorists despite applying capital punishments and increasing security in many developed countries. In addition, an aggressive person might become more aggravated due to the implementation of rigorous rules. By this way, to make man behave appropriately, there should be an integration of different methods rather than law.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of law on people’s behavior is prominent, although the way other methods, for instance, enhancing education for individuals can affect human manners should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...re. As an illustration, there are still a large number of extremely serious criminals such as dru...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35806451613 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10288543503 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4208478241 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.769230769 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286218690736 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100250545318 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965977525149 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17829532497 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752854142659 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.