Medical technology can increase life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse?
In recent years, the life expectancy of people is getting increase due to drastic development in medical science sparked heated debate. Although such issue is contested by many, it is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that medical technology has improved human’s life, and I will elaborate in this essay.
To begin with, we cannot deny the fact that due to development in medical field has increase life expectancy of people. Nowadays medical science instruments are become more advanced. For example, new invention in medical field has found solutions for many dreadful diseases such as cancer, HIV and many. Moreover, Government from different countries have paid attention on bringing healthcare to every citizen. A recent data of Times magazine shows that average age of death of person has increased from 46.7 in 1990 to 65.2 in 2019.
On the other hand, improvement in public health and medical care facilities, countries are facing ageing population which put an extra economic burden on society. For example, regular health checkups and constant observation of health care experts are usually expensive and it can burden on families.
In conclusion, there is deed both positive and negative impact from increasing life expectancy. However, it is almost impossible to neglect its benefits to everyone in society. So we can say that medical treatment is blessing for us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
... are become more advanced. For example, new invention in medical field has found solutions fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...economic burden on society. For example, regular health checkups and constant obs...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37021276596 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84452727987 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642553191489 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2998818519 50.4703680194 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0769230769 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298890032268 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896902429414 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077507490514 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166559181466 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789631942059 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.