Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter whether library books have become useless, as more information is now available online. This has elicited stimulated disputation among the public. some group of people agrees with this notion due to the facts that more information can be gathered online in a short span of time. Although its sound true, I still believe that the libraries are still useful. This essay will further elaborate reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, There are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that the library provides authentic information. whereas, information collected from the internet could be misleading, which would require further more time and efforts to confirm the authenticity of the information. So, eventually, a research could end up more confused than the one who gathered the information using the library books.
On the contrary, there are skeptics who conjecture that finding a relevant information using library books is a tough job. Whereas using internet researchers can do the web search and can find the relevant information in a few seconds. Although it seems ostensibly veridical this is not true, as yes its easy to do a search on the internet, but it is hard to confirm the authenticity of the information.
After analyzing the above facts I would like to recapitulate that library books provide us the authentic information whereas information from the internet can not be trusted. Hence, Library books are not useless.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...timulated disputation among the public. some group of people agrees with this notion...
^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...library provides authentic information. whereas, information collected from the interne...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Hence, Library books are not useless.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, second, so, still, then, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14339622642 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81334358022 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532075471698 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9726919023 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.846153846 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155629586875 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659719142929 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694187364829 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104796923538 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04808394164 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.