Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter whether library books are still useful. Whereas some group of people says that more information now available online so the library books are useless, I sanguinely believe that they are not. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion but one of the most compelling reason is that books are the source of authentic knowledge. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that students who sourced their assignment from the library books were more successful than the one who sourced the information from the internet. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both library books and information gathered from the internet apparently can be seen.
At the outset, there are some skeptics who conjecture that information from the internet can be gathered in a short span of time. Due to which the use of library books is less popular. Although it seems ostensibly veridical this is not right. Most students still refer to the library books for authentic sources.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both of the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of library books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantage of using library books prove the significance of authentic information but also pinpoint on implications of gathering information from the internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pparently can be seen. At the outset, there are some skeptics who conjecture t...
^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e use of library books is less popular. Although it seems ostensibly veridical this is n...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, so, still, then, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21875 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77857139271 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54296875 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9078482863 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194665214206 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800553862484 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631740037953 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128188438481 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252914909832 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.