Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether the only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. Whereas some people agree with this statement, I sanguinely disagree. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that urbanization is not a permanent solution. According to my own experience when I was a student, I conducted research which reveals that urbanization does not effectively deal with unemployment. Hence, the ramification of urbanization apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that only rapid urbanization can deal with the unemployment, as it creates multiple jobs opportunities at the same time. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. As a tangible example, research conducted by a reputed organization showed that urbanization does not deal with the unemployment effectively. Hence, it is correct to presume a preconceived notion of skeptics.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the problems emerge due to urbanization far outweigh its benefits. Not only the issues occurred proves its insignificance, but also pinpoints the implication of implementing it without adequate planning.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57079646018 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28339156858 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615044247788 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6369969178 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.916666667 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392657599041 0.242375264174 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113512352061 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125640149957 0.071462118173 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201346273228 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895394394764 0.0609392437508 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.