The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. To what extent do you agree with it?
The most conspicuous trend of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people to believe that unemployment will be reduced due to moving to urban areas. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this, and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that the only way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization but moving to the urban areas, increases the population of urban areas and enhances the inflation rate in urban areas. I totally disagree with the statement. People should stay in their places and seek jobs in surrounding areas and governments are responsible to provide people jobs. Thanks to the wide range of advantages being offered by effective ways to deal with unemployment. They enhance the standard of their life with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as, augmenting their chances of a better life is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, one can broaden their horizons. Thus, learning such essential attributions as dedication and responsibilities. Hence, It is apparent why many are in favor of not moving to urban areas for unemployment purposes.
To conclude, the benefits of not moving to urban areas for unemployment purposes are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, thus, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89259259259 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87805423144 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559259259259 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4742122533 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0666666667 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.06666666667 7.25397266985 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26836881069 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779805710637 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943692800137 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133001373389 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100875093657 0.0609392437508 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 12.6369458128 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.