Parents have a greater influence on their children’s future success than schools do. Governments should, therefore, provide “parenting training courses” rather than “teacher training courses”. Do you agree with this idea?
The children’s future would be bright because of their parents rather than the schoolings. So the government should take necessary steps to coach the parents more than the schooling staffs. According to me, I totally agree with this point. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, critics may point out that one of the most significant benefits of training given to the parents would help and mold the offspring in a good shape with safe to the home and the society. For example, the children should shine in the behavior with good attitudes but it could be possible because of the parents grew up them in a splendid way.
On the other hand, in spite of these arguments, giving and focusing more only on teacher training courses rather than parenting training courses have negative consequences in various ways. Firstly, the teachers would always concentrate on academic portions and they printed very less on moral character. Secondly, they could not monitor all the children at a same time.
Lastly, in my opinion, parents are more important than teachers to guide them a right path.
Taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective, without a shadow of a doubt, I conclude that the government bodies could more conscience on parenting training courses rather than teacher training courses would create a society with great concern of the children in a better future for themselves as well as the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...parents more than the schooling staffs. According to me, I totally agree with this point. In th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a splendid way" with adverb for "splendid"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ble because of the parents grew up them in a splendid way. On the other hand, in spite of these ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, as well as, in my opinion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.5418719212 28% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98804780876 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66339950542 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569721115538 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.5069517206 50.4703680194 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.818181818 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3636363636 7.25397266985 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299172779934 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102558251099 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904624260392 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148903271543 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775764610807 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.