Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The modern era has seen many changes with the necessary groundwork that was laid in the past century of technological advancements. The current topic of parents should be held legally responsible for children’s activities can be explained further through careful considerations which will intimately evaluate the topic. There are opposing views on every stance, and this topic is no different. I would like to discuss both viewpoints.
To review the first case of the topic parents should watch over their children daily activities; one can put the case forth by stating that parents should teach their children how to behave with others. My case can be further stated with a great degree of evaluation that parents are the first teachers for their children. In addition, there is no denying the fact that children spend most of the time with their parents. However, another point of view cannot be ignored which is children learn all the habit’s first from their parents. If we look at the other side of the issue, there are other factors that may affect the behavior of children.
Moreover, it is quite evident that the behavior of neighborhood, friends also impact the behavior of a child. Consequently, one can confidently state that the environment in which the living also affect the life of the child. Hence, it is clear that parents are not the only factor that influences the behavior of children.
In conclusion, the current topic can be summarized as parents and other factors that are legally responsible for the children’s act.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1015625 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81171592803 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54296875 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3253793963 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.461538462 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292635435798 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988922282732 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100074325063 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194484250542 0.151781067708 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998599730225 0.0609392437508 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.