Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of ambivalence over this matter whether the government should build an advanced transport system rather new roads, this has elicited a stimulated disputation among the public. Whereas few skeptics conjecture that government should build new roads rather building an advanced transport system, I sanguinely believe that government should focus on the advancement of the transport system. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that advanced transport system will reduce the traffic from the roads as more people opt for it. For example, if people start opting for the public transport, then the number of cars from the road will be reduced.
On the contrary, some individuals believe that the government should build the new roads, as the existing roads are in bad condition, which causes the traffic conjunctions. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is not true, as more cars are on the road due to the bad public transport system.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of an advanced transport system far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of advanced transport system prove the significance of public transport, but also pinpoint the implications of the bad public transport system.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, whereas, while, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28512396694 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71023037367 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520661157025 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4525879332 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.111111111 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350748139137 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157366843418 0.0925447433944 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096709711197 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212617402383 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536376109643 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.