Polygamy has led to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solutions for various situations to reduce the issue.
The importance of polygamy which was debatable has now become controvetial. The substantial influence of married to multiple partner has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend, in recent years. It can be said that, polygamy has contributed to vast majority of divorce rate and have effected individuals around the globe. This essay will elaborate why, polygamy can break families and cause emotional stress to individuals involved and offer solutions to overcome this issue and thus, lead to a logical conclusion.
At the offset, there are numerous reasons why polygamy should be voided completely from the society, but the most conspicuous on stems from the fact that, it can be traumatising. Example for instance, marrying multiple partners increase responsibilities, ultimately causing separation and end of marriage, which involves emotional hurt and financial burden respectively. Furthermore, multiple marriages can have devastating affect on a person’s emotional and financial state.
Another reason why, polygamy must be analysed to solve the massive divorce rate issue is that regulations can be implemented to minimise the number of divorce in the globe and thus, will result in reducing the stain on the marriage. For instance, polygamy should be made a punishable offence, strict government regulations, hefty fine and possible jail time. Based on solutions provided, it can be said that divorce rate can be controlled if there were enough collaborations.
For what has been said above, it can be concluded that polygamy leading to high divorce rate is prominent, but stricter law to control this issue should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...multiple marriages can have devastating affect on a person's emotional and financial...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53696498054 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04575075761 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587548638132 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9009026809 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.363636364 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204449516332 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812985308897 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689660687327 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129840449769 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681965013582 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.