Positive and negative effects of today’s communication
The discussion on today’s communication media is a debatable one and has its logical arguments. I believe that the communication system has had more negative results on the society than positive. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, critics may point out that one of the most significant benefit of telecommunication is linking the people with instant and bonded relation. For example, the human beings could easily contact the lovable person for the marriage occasion and for condolence purpose as well. They could smoothly proceed any emergency situation with all the procedures keep ready to do the treatment and hospitalized methodology.
On the other hand, in spite of these arguments, the communication media such as Whats-app, mails, Facebook etc. have negative consequences in various ways. Firstly, the internet scrapper uses the mail to send the spam mails to grab the secret message and passwords of the banking system. Secondly, the rumors have been spreading in the Facebook and Whats-app and it could affect the moral mentality of the people. The youth would be targeted in the Facebook, especially the girls and women and the vulgar people are playing with the virginity through the communication and social media.
Lastly, in my opinion, mass media has merits and demerits, it depends upon, how we could use the track.
Taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective, without a shadow of a doubt, I conclude that negative effects have more than the positive effects in today’s communication network.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, such as, in my opinion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26538461538 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95231079889 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619230769231 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0157000715 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.307692308 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262363598336 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815100593833 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128372980756 0.071462118173 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151525833281 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170961015597 0.0609392437508 281% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.