As a result of advances in medical care. Average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s society is furtherance in medical field. Medical science has made various break throughs in recent years. Medical assistance have improved quality and longevity of people’s life. Although, some expertise consider this break though as significant improvement, some expertise believe that it will affect negatively to the society. This essay will discuss, improvement in medical care is a marvellous refinement and ageing population can impact society negatively.
Firstly, modern medical equipment in medial care facilities are helping doctors to identify cause of the disease more efficiently. Patients feel more positive once the root cause of illness is determined, which also helps in improving patients overall health. For example, MRF scanners, laser therapy, Chemotherapy, cosmetics surgeries, etc. Advancement in medical care increase people’s life span and they live longer and healthier. Thus we can say, medical care is a constructive evolution.
Secondly, ageing population can bring challenges to the society. It becomes difficult to maintain supply and demand and sustain infrastructure. Increased ageing population can demand more aged care workers, more hospitals in already exhausted infrastructure, decline in housing affordability, overcrowded schools and transports, deforestation and scarcity of natural resources and increased crime rates. Therefore, it can be said growing ageing population can have negative impact on society.
In conclusion, this essay discussed, why improvement in medical care increases quality of life and satisfaction level, and why it can be detrimental in terms of resources. In my opinion, improvement in medical care means world can mature and learn from experienced mind, which is positive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...pan and they live longer and healthier. Thus we can say, medical care is a construct...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96538461538 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17278320319 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619230769231 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7480762819 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9375 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243712770788 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787178429231 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053105804295 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140366748525 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357818150488 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 53.1260098522 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.05 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.