The role of human cloning has accelerated rapidly. To what extent you think will it replace the material things.
Undoubtedly, no one can abnegate the important role of human cloning in today’s world. The cloning of animals has been occurring for years now. In recent times, with advancement in science and technology, cloning of humans has also become possible. However, one section of the society believe that it will be very beneficial for human but other oppose this notation. In my opinion although it is a great thing, but excessive usage of it, might not be the right idea.
To Initiate, there are multiple benefits of human cloning. The first and foremost reason is that people who lose their body parts and are born with some of deficiency, can use this cloning technique, which allow or help them to do all the activities. It is a great news for those who lose their loved ones, with human cloning, they might be able to live with someone look alike of their beloved. The major benefit is that dependency on organ donors is much reduced, so with the help of cloning doctors are able to quickly replace organ and save life of many people.
Diving deeper into the topic, there is an strong argument against human cloning because there is a real possibility that human would become more of a commodity than an individual . Every country will then employ more of human clones in the defense services. By cloning technique, crime will definitely increase. One will never be able to find out the criminal . It will be cause of reduce sense of individuality .
In the crux, we can say that every coin has two sides. There are plethora benefits of human cloning over its disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 257, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great news'.
Suggestion: great news
...lp them to do all the activities. It is a great news for those who lose their loved ones, wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 367, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'looks'.
Suggestion: looks
...they might be able to live with someone look alike of their beloved. The major benef...
^^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... Diving deeper into the topic, there is an strong argument against human cloning b...
^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e more of a commodity than an individual . Every country will then employ more of ...
^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...l never be able to find out the criminal . It will be cause of reduce sense of ind...
^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...able to find out the criminal . It will be cause of reduce sense of individuality . In ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e cause of reduce sense of individuality . In the crux, we can say that every coi...
^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f human cloning over its disadvantages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, then, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7700729927 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50436416121 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598540145985 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6261482801 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6875 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.25397266985 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202019096604 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725530444027 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045065123262 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12135780633 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472923948966 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 12.6369458128 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.5310837438 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.