Should there be a maximum wage for highly-paid people? Is it good or bad?
Recently, the phenomenon of a maximum wage and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the salary is highly beneficial, such issue is regarding thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that highly-paid people can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essey.
From a social standpoint, the increasing of wage can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of more payments as well as more money are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered highly-paid employees. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both the companies' budget and their policies apparantly can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the high- level wage might increase the consequences of satisfied workers. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the good income could relate to this reality that the demerits of being more responsible pertain to hard working. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of decreasing payments is correlated negatively with the last result. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of attitudes.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the high-range of wage far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of motivating labors prove the significance of being loyalty to employers, but also pinpoint the possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4921875 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16026006087 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65234375 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4444072088 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.166666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240493027682 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716423188347 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548185544409 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128054585048 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503438763736 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.