In some countries, the number of shootings increases because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Keeping gun at home has been the epicenter of discussion in multiple forums and a conclusive unanimous agreement is yet to be achieved. Different distinguished individuals have expressed their views both in favor and against the very idea of keeping gun at home through multiple modes of communication be it a main stream media or be it the social media. Below in essay of mine I will try to enunciate that number of shooting can increase if people has gun at home with some reasons and examples.
The most prominent reason is that some people lives outside the city and near jungle. Those families want to keep the gun at home for their safety from any type of human or animal attack. Moreover, some political leaders, military people have licensed weapons and security for the sake of their safety. In addition, some people receive threatening calls and they tend to keep guns to protect themselves from any type of attack.
Continuing to this government should impose some strict law against keeping guns at home. Moreover, regime should do some inquiry about the people surroundings and living status before issuing a gun to them. Furthermore, children can misuse the gun as they are not aware of its seriousness and youth can commit crimes if they are not happy among their surroundings. For example, last year in USA 30 percent crime rate was recorded by gun shooting in young children which highest among the world.
While on the other hand, there are people who will still continue to wrangling about the facts homicide guns. However, we cannot be oblivious to the facts of keeping guns at home. I would like to conclude that homicide guns increased the crime rate and this can be restricted by imposing strict law.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 454, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'gunned'.
Suggestion: gunned
... of shooting can increase if people has gun at home with some reasons and examples....
^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facts'' or 'fact's'?
Suggestion: facts'; fact's
...l still continue to wrangling about the facts homicide guns. However, we cannot be ob...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n be restricted by imposing strict law.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86148648649 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52874047633 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8455044973 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.785714286 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241888097683 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930570757932 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583002695059 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150114398982 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407438981418 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.