Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter whether the public transport should be free of charge or not. This is elicited stimulated disputation among the public, whereas some people say that public transport should not be free, I sanguinely believe that the public transport should be made available free of charge. This essay will further elaborate reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion but one of the most compelling reason is that when the public transport is free the number of daily commuters would start using the public transport. This, in turn, will reduce the traffic from the road and will also help in the reduction of the air pollution.
On the contrary, there are skeptics who conjecture that making transport free will put an extra financial burden on the transport department. This will impact the maintenance of the transport infrastructure. Although it seems ostensibly veridical this is not the case, as the government can easily manage the expenses cheaply by putting a small tax by which the transport department can manage the finances easily.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that freeing the transport system far outweigh its drawbacks. Freeing the transport system not only encourage the people to use the public transport it will also help in the reduction of the traffic from the roads.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63079077289 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.463775661 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.7 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268605918696 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112014733227 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105680014134 0.071462118173 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164888451492 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827931809865 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.