Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether our past helps us understand present. Whereas some people disagree with this fact, I sanguinely agree. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that past study can teach us about our legacy. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the benefits of past study. Thus, the beneficial ramification of understanding the past apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that past facts cannot be trusted, hence studying them doesn't help. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. As a tangible example, researchers from a reputed company proved that knowing the past helps in many ways. Hence, this is correct to presume a preconceived notion of opponents.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of studying history far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of studying history prove its significance, but also pinpoints implications of not doing so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... cannot be trusted, hence studying them doesnt help. Although it seems ostensibly veri...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28169014085 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86568093539 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671361502347 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5323227151 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238376334625 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761785264395 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538354090728 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129928526874 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377218284939 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.