Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether our past helps us understand present. Whereas some people disagree with this fact, I sanguinely agree. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that past study can teach us about our legacy and would increase our confidence. Another cogent reason is that knowledge of past helps in future research. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the benefits of past study. Thus, the beneficial ramification of understanding the past apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that past facts cannot be trusted. Hence studying them doesn't help. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. As a tangible example, researchers from a reputed company proved that knowing the past helps in many ways. Hence, this is correct to presume a preconceived notion of opponents.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of studying history far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of studying history prove its significance, but also pinpoints implications of not doing so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ture that past facts cannot be trusted. Hence studying them doesnt help. Although it ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... cannot be trusted. Hence studying them doesnt help. Although it seems ostensibly veri...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28695652174 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.847822768 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65652173913 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7796919205 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8571428571 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241904857273 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074439565222 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488739398184 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13158540426 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397885138203 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.