Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter whether universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge and should give more practical training throughout their courses. This has elicited stimulated disputation among the public. Whereas some people do not agree with this notion, I believe that practical as well as theoretical knowledge is important for the student. This essay will further elaborate reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, conspicuously, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion but one of the most compelling reason is that practical knowledge students will understand more easily. For example, in theoretical knowledge student just read about a particular subject but when the same is shown to them practically they would learn the subject more easily.
On the contrary, there are some skeptics who conjecture that it is more important to understand the subject theoretically and if a student does not understand the logic behind the practical training being done, than the practical training is of no use. Although it seems ostensibly veridical this is not the case, as the theoretical knowledge is still important and should be given before the practical training.
After analyzing the above facts I would like to recapitulate that I would agree to the full extent that the universities should give more of the practical training then should reduce the theoretical knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...given before the practical training. After analyzing the above facts I would like ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, well, whereas, for example, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34166666667 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86471590602 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.6768348989 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.444444444 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361573355062 0.242375264174 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140411403713 0.0925447433944 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127893363006 0.071462118173 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216002193508 0.151781067708 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799962455806 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.