Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter whether the universities should focus on giving more practical training then theoretical knowledge. Whereas some group of people says that universities should focus more theoretical knowledge, I sanguinely believe that there should be more focus on practical training. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion but one of the most compelling reason is that practical training gives more exposure to the student than the theoretical knowledge. For example, a student has read the theory about how to perform a science experiment. He will have the less clarity than the student who has performed the science experiment.
On the contrary, there are skeptics who conjecture that universities should provide the theoretical knowledge as it is very important that a student understand the basics. Although it seems ostensibly veridical this is not correct, as the theoretical knowledge should still be given.
After Analysing the above facts, I would like to recapitulate that there are several compelling arguments from both the side, but the benefits of practical training outweigh its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...focus on giving more practical training then theoretical knowledge. Whereas some gro...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, then, whereas, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 206.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41262135922 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84138202046 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 139.433497537 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558252427184 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7290884998 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.888888889 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284231670633 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107904119752 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100860523332 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147284179808 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083003162095 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.