Over the past few years, there has been a high degree of ambivalence over this matter, whether travel is really necessary for studies. whereas, some people say that it is overrated, as there have been good scholars who studied locally. I sanguinely believe that travel to study gives move exposure. This essay will further discuss the reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that travel provides the local experience. which is hard to gain locally. According to my own experience. When I was a university student. I conducted research which proved that student who travelled to study had a better understanding than the one thought in the classroom. Thus, the beneficial ramification of the travel to study apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, some sceptics conjecture that travelling to study is over-ratted, as now there is a different mode of communications systems are available, which student can utilize to communicate with the foreign students, which can help students to gain the same level of knowledge. Although it seems ostensibly veridical but does not provide the same level of exposure as travelling. As a tangible example, research conducted by a reputed organization revealed that student who travels to study were more confident than the one studied locally. Hence, this is correct to presume a preconceived notion of the sceptics.
To conclude, where there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that travel to study for tertiary studies far outrights its drawbacks. Not only do the benefits of travelling proves its significance, but also pinpoints the implications of not doing so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...travel is really necessary for studies. whereas, some people say that it is overrated, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...t travel provides the local experience. which is hard to gain locally. According to m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t travel provides the local experience. which is hard to gain locally. According to m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ocally. According to my own experience. When I was a university student. I conducted...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, really, so, then, thus, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 5.94088669951 269% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21875 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92140611954 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8651520618 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9375 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429603158314 0.242375264174 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128036111988 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115175803091 0.071462118173 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256024180609 0.151781067708 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264649045364 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.