Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies?
Travel broadens our knowledge of global culture, language, people, lifestyle etc. it is believed to be greatest investment, in terms of acquiring qualifications from overseas. Although, traveling for higher education often results in hefty price, it is still believed to be beneficial for overall success of an individual. This essay will discuss, why travelling for education can be a costly prepositions and with travel potential for opportunities and self growth increases.
Firstly, travelling for education can cost more than local education. Only wealthy can afford an expensive higher education abroad. For example, according to a study at financial institute of New York, only 16 percent of local students can afford to study abroad; due to lack of financial support from family and inability to pay student loan debt. Therefore, it can be said overseas education is a Luxury, only a few can afford.
Secondly, traveling for education can open plethora of opportunities. Travel for studies helps us become independent. For instance, education abroad helps an individual in improving organisation skills, manage their own finances and maintain social circle, which ultimately boost a persons confidence in overcoming challenges of life. Hence, it can be said travelling for education helps in overall development.
To conclude, this essay discussed overseas education can be expensive and therefore sometimes not possible to achieve, and travel for studies can open vast opportunities. In my opinion, travelling for education is a positive step forward to prosperous future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the greatest'.
Suggestion: be the greatest
...eople, lifestyle etc. it is believed to be greatest investment, in terms of acquiring quali...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...social circle, which ultimately boost a persons confidence in overcoming challenges of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62916666667 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08929322643 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.1454940154 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246201846701 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106162193301 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787046329205 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172680582327 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129372095722 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.