Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies?
Travel broadens our knowledge of global culture, language, people, lifestyle etc. it is believed to be the greatest investment, in terms of acquiring qualifications from overseas. Although, traveling for higher education often results in hefty price, it is still believed to be beneficial for overall success of an individual. This essay will discuss, why travelling for education can be a costly prepositions and with travel potential for opportunities and self growth increases.
Firstly, travelling for education can cost more than local education. Local education is equally beneficial as overseas education and can result in success and fame. For example, Ratan Tata a influencer and pioneer in Indian automotive industry gained success and global recognition by acquiring local education in India. Therefore, it can be said travelling overseas for education is not a prerequisite to be successful.
Secondly, traveling for education can open plethora of opportunities. Travel for studies helps us become independent. For instance, education abroad helps an individual in improving organisation skills, manage their own finances and maintain social circle, which ultimately boosts an individuals confidence in overcoming challenges of life. Hence, it can be said travelling for education helps in overall development.
To conclude, this essay discussed overseas education can be expensive and therefore sometimes not possible to achieve, and travel for studies can open vast opportunities. In my opinion, travelling for education is a positive step forward a prosperous future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ccess and fame. For example, Ratan Tata a influencer and pioneer in Indian automo...
^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...cial circle, which ultimately boosts an individuals confidence in overcoming challenges of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, as for, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83261802575 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20262560596 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56652360515 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5377401092 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0714285714 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6428571429 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207578979979 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986097450215 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763029822114 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151649954613 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423432572465 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 53.1260098522 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.