Universities should penalize the students for the late submission of their work. Do you agree or disagree and represent your viewpoints in this regard.
Students' work is the only way to gauge students' ability of acquiring knowledge in the university. It is through the work that professor will have the chance to see the student progress. Albeit some people believe that penalizing late submission will only put press on students, making them commit more errors, others think otherwise. In my opinion, before deciding what is better than the other I will first analize both sides and then take a decision about the subject.
To commence with, by penalizing late works, professor are as a matter of fact trying to show students that what they need to learn in life impending is the fact that their pupils will face many hindrances later on. Begining as soon as possible learning those nuisances, they may not commit the same mistakes afterwords. Thus, learning from the begining averts further drawbacks.
However, it is likely that students ought to have many works all at the same time to be delivered and this may really become extremelly intricate to hang on. Then, it is somehow complicated to procure deliver all together. Some works will certainly have a delay. Therefore, any kind of penalization is not fare due to the fact of the amount of work given to students.
Finally, as it is stated in this article, the process of penalization outdoes not being penalized.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, thus, kind of, as a matter of fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91964285714 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58061587309 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3916748997 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8333333333 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169108818379 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577016581015 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043315633363 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966349820321 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213818792522 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 12.6369458128 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.