What are the Positive and negative effects of the information revolution though mass media?
One of the conspicuous trend of today’s contemporary era is Information distribution with the support of mass media. Mass media plays a vital role in bringing awareness to people. Although, there has been several claims that mass media brings positive changes, others disagree with this notion. This essay will discuss, how mass media can be used to educate and help people make informed decisions and why sometimes mass media can have negative effects.
Firstly, media constantly attract high number of people with their punch lines. This practice is effective when wellbeing of people living in society is concerned. For instance, utilising mass media to stop people from drinking and driving, government subsidy awareness, helpline numbers for domestic violence, etc. Mass media educate people about their rights and duties. Thus, mass media is a means of spreading consciousness.
Secondly, spreading information though mass communication channels can have adverse effects. large organisation target mass media for their own selfish benefits. For example, promoting tobacco products on mass media platforms can have detrimental effect on young minds. Additionally, fast food advertising can lead the nation towards unhealthy lifestyle. Hence, it can be said Information though mass media can jeopardise societies wellbeing.
To conclude, this essay discussed mass media plays a pivotal role in spreading awareness and can also influence people to chose wrong path. In my opinion, positive overweights negative, I highly support information exchange though mass media revolution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Large
...tion channels can have adverse effects. large organisation target mass media for thei...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
... and can also influence people to chose wrong path. In my opinion, positive overweigh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76694915254 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81188369033 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622881355932 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.552473655 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0625 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 20.9669160288 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379631392945 0.242375264174 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13994027869 0.0925447433944 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729585098526 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246933247924 0.151781067708 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496212417731 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.59 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.