Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of building design and its corresponding impacts on the environment has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the impact of building architecture is highly beneficial for society, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial numbers of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that having modern and durable architectural structures can be a plus, and this essay examines this idea by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, from a social standpoint, affecting people’s lives by providing them a suitable and comfortable working condition through some well-design architecture could bring many beneficial effects for society and individuals as well. According to my own experience, when I was a student and I perform an academic survey, the results revealed that positive consequences of buildings' design, especially on house-wives, are extremely high. Thus, the beneficial ramification of interior design and daily life apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of architecture science, an unbearable design might increase the detrimental impacts on daily lifestyle. Furthermore, the city building facades have positively correlated with attracting tourism to any city. Not to mention that, due to an academic research conducted by Tehran University, 35% of the modern building designed based on latest architectural designing, are considered tax free by authorities for encouraging other builders to construct well-designed accommodation.
To recapitulate I pen down saying that although some opponents tend to think that design of a building could not have positive effects, I highly inclined to believe that the positive consequences of an incredible building far beyond of its disadvantages. Of course, governments should consider this issue as a matter of importance and raise the public awareness about it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77162629758 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30829507054 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608996539792 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8117643728 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.636363636 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28568949908 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100851987781 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505984449477 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166026379204 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172563750993 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.