Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Experimental learning is a process of which students acquire knowledge for real. It is the second way of getting knowledge after theory where pupils see in practice perhaps using laboratories or sometimes being in site seeing how the environment reacts by aplying the laws of nature in some occasions. Albeit some people believe that there is no desideratum to go through more details beyound theory, others think otherwise. In my opinion, everyone must work with experiment in order to acquire the due knowledge.
To commence with, experiments provide student with further knowledge. They need to put in practice what they have been learning so far in theory and even sometimes they may end up finding extra results which they could not find if they were merely going through theory. That is another primordial learning. Some years ago we could see this situation from Stephen Hawking. He was stunned by the results of his works. Also, he gave a huge contribution to society about cosmology.
Moreover, by aplying the theory in laboratories or any other place, one can not only contribute to the development of the world, but also to their career.
Finally, experimental combined with theory can bring great outcomes to people. Furthermore, it may be the source of crucial innovations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, even so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 1207.87684729 90% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12796208531 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75755270902 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691943127962 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.5252208462 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2307692308 104.977214359 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2307692308 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 2.91625615764 309% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113169853764 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380446752126 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433807106265 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066157906068 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246121534679 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 56.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.