Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals?
Recently, the phenomenon of accelerated xenophobia in Western countries and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of efficient governments are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that proposed solutions can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, impeding xenophobia can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of efficient treatments, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of responsible persons. Thus, beneficial ramifications of Western governments are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, accelerating xenophobia in Western countries can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient solutions are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described frustrated people. Hence, predicted outcomes of irresponsible governments are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of accelerated xenophobia in Western countries far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of proposing solutions prove the significance of a sophisticated government, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00888888889 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41755525934 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1358485097 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.909090909 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32597160554 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100687551135 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653518791174 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175863993246 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388329315032 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.