Endangered Species
Many environmentalists support the current system of laws that works to save all species that may become extinct. They claim that the current variety of organisms that exist on Earth must be preserved. This idea has long been held as our moral and practical responsibility, but this safeguarding of endangered species is unnatural and poses many drawbacks.
First, many claim that the extinction of any animal will certainly lead to ecological disaster, but this is an exaggeration. Fossil evidence clearly demonstrates that in the evolutionary history of the Earth, extinctions have occurred several times, one well-known example of this being that of the dinosaur. Once the predominant organism, it too became extinct. This sudden relative destruction of biodiversity did not result in lasting harm to life on Earth, but in a natural emergence of different species.
Also, with the advent of technologies such as genetic engineering scientists no longer depend on nature as a source of inspiration for medication. The need for the preservation of all species is often supported by the idea that each may prove to have some medicinal applications. The truth is that with genetic engineering, research scientists are more able to heal disease than they ever have been before. So, the natural lose of one species to extinction will not significantly harm the progress of medicine.
Third, the huge cost of saving a species from extinction is often not justified. For example, the California Condor depended on the mammoth as a source of food. When the mammoth became extinct, the condor was naturally next to follow. But, instead, millions were spent to restore the dwindling condor population. Money that could have been spent on more urgent needs was instead spent on saving an animal that nature could no longer support.
The article claims that preseving different organisms on the erath poses many difficulties for us and provide three reasons of support. However, the preofessor says that extinction of organisms has many harmful consequences and refutes each of the author’s reason.
First, the reading avers that it is an overstate that many contend animal extinction will lead to ecological disaster. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the author fails to consider and mention dramatic change that occurred after dinosaurs extinction. He mentions after this extinction, the earth’s surface was changed any many other species were extinct. According to the professor, species extinction would altere ecosystem on the erath and it can menace our lives on the earth.
Second, the article posits that we no longer rely on nature for medication by using new technologies. The professor says that nature still has a powerful role in medication. He explains species and plants, we know yet, compose 40 percent of medical values. He adds, if further organisms will be extinct, we lose the oppurtunity to discover new medicine.
Third, the reading claims that cost of saving a species from extinction is unwarranted. The professor refutes this point by explaining that it has numerous benefits for us. As professor said, if 43 percent of fresh muscels extict, we lose 10000 jobs. So, US economy will suffer economical hardship. Even if we consider only financial benefits, animals deserve to be saved.
Sentence: The article claims that preseving different organisms on the erath poses many difficulties for us and provide three reasons of support.
Error: preseving Suggestion: preserving
Error: erath Suggestion: earth
Sentence: However, the preofessor says that extinction of organisms has many harmful consequences and refutes each of the author's reason.
Error: preofessor Suggestion: professor
Sentence: According to the professor, species extinction would altere ecosystem on the erath and it can menace our lives on the earth.
Error: altere Suggestion: alter
Sentence: He adds, if further organisms will be extinct, we lose the oppurtunity to discover new medicine.
Error: oppurtunity Suggestion: opportunity
Sentence: As professor said, if 43 percent of fresh muscels extict, we lose 10000 jobs.
Error: muscels Suggestion: muscles
Error: extict Suggestion: extinct
flaws:
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 15 12
No. of Words: 238 250
No. of Characters: 1224 1200
No. of Different Words: 141 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.928 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.143 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.656 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 48 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.867 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.947 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.545 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.167 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4