Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects person who is being accused of the crime.
some lawyears have suggested that this practise should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case.
This paper will be concerned on some entities that asked to change laws in the field of making decision of criminals. Some jurists suggest the jury of defendant's that were made before should be given in order to be more accurately in making inferences on present crime.
It is an obvious phenomenon that every day huge number of peoples commit crimes over the world. In this way, the judges come across with variety of criminals and they bear responsibility for their each resolution. Sometimes, they make flaw decisions. For decreasing the risk of such errors, jurisconsult was taken an of...
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Sentence: For decreasing the risk of such errors, jurisconsult was taken an offer on giving liberties to review defentant's crimes in the past.
Error: jurisconsult Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: There is no doubt that deeper investigation on the past criminal records of the convict till the period of criminal case, helps for judgers to be more accurate on making decision.
Error: judgers Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: And judgers have to adjudicate according to today's law-breaking activities.
Error: judgers Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Furthermore, there were several situations when prosecutors overestimated crime commiters with giving incorrect information about their previous crime.
Error: commiters Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: In a nutshell, I tend to believe that judgers should make decisions ought to present law-breakings.
Error: judgers Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: It would be a grave error if indictees conduct penalties over and over again.
Error: indictees Suggestion: indicates
flaws:
No. of Words: 274 350
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.033 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 274 350
No. of Characters: 1369 1500
No. of Different Words: 174 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.069 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.996 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.713 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 97 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 71 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.267 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.577 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.281 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.505 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.033 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5