Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number of skateboard users in the plaza. There has also been a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza. Thus, we recommend that the city prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. If skateboarding is prohibited here, we predict that business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels.
Though it may be true that the increase in the popularity of skateboarding might have led to the increase in the number of skateboarders in the plaza, the author's arguments fails to provide a rational base for the claim that the increase in the skateboarding must have been the cause for the decrease in the number of shoppers visiting Central Plaza.
The decreasing standards in the shopkeepers' business acting as a to their failure to attract the inflow of customers seriously erodes the rational base of their assumption that the increase in the number of skateboarders may be the reason for the decline in their business.
It may be alluring to attribute the reason for the increasing dirtiness in the mall to the skateboarders fails to rely on any logical foundation. The increased littering and vandalism may be a result of indifference of the Central Plaza mall authorities in enforcing strict rules for the past two years and also may be due to the inefficient working of the cleaning staff at the mall.
Deciding to prohibit the skateboarding entirely basing on the fallacious assumptions of already panicked shopkeepers would be an act built upon some illogical reasons.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.275862068966 0.25644967241 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.133004926108 0.15541462614 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.064039408867 0.0836205057962 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0197044334975 0.0520304965353 38% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0246305418719 0.0272364105082 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.167487684729 0.125424944231 134% => OK
Participles: 0.0591133004926 0.0416121511921 142% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.03274747838 2.79052419416 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0443349753695 0.026700313972 166% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.187192118227 0.113004496875 166% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0394088669951 0.0255425247493 154% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0127820249294 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1189.0 2731.13054187 44% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 197.0 446.07635468 44% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03553299492 6.12365571057 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.57801047555 82% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.360406091371 0.378187486979 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289340101523 0.287650121315 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.238578680203 0.208842608468 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152284263959 0.135150697306 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03274747838 2.79052419416 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 207.018472906 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51269035533 0.469332199767 109% => OK
Word variations: 44.3687779869 52.1807786196 85% => OK
How many sentences: 5.0 20.039408867 25% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 39.4 23.2022227129 170% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.6668174961 57.7814097925 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 237.8 141.986410481 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.4 23.2022227129 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.724660767414 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.58251231527 0% => OK
Readability: 68.3340101523 51.9672348444 131% => OK
Elegance: 2.83333333333 1.8405768891 154% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.623430937588 0.441005458295 141% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.356278070639 0.135418324435 263% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.147217098251 0.0829849096947 177% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.935816264671 0.58762219726 159% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0865303066682 0.147661913831 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.415156563038 0.193483328276 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142463744503 0.0970749176394 147% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.52452375247 0.42659136922 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.17009796312 0.0774707102158 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.443868137146 0.312017818177 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147707182832 0.0698173142475 212% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.87684729064 29% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.82512315271 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 6.46551724138 46% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 5.0 14.657635468 34% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.