“As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.”
“As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.”
intro: true to a certain point , but fundementals do matter and there is always a broken link which when connected debunks the complexity or mystery
1:geocentric theory and heliocentric theory
2:evolution explained by charles darwin
con: hence proved
The statement as we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious is agreeable upto a certain point as it is only a matter of time when this complexity and mystery is debunked by linking the chains of learning previously acquired knowledge.
To demonstrate this with an example, consider the long lost geo-centric theory wherein certain astronomers tried to deduce that planet Earth is the center of our solar system and planets and stars like Sun revolve around it in a fixed axis. This theory when stated at its time provided enough mystery and complications regarding how days and nights alter at equinox's, placements of planets and most importantly certain theories like eclipses. This theory was then debunked with laconic explainations by Copernicus by providing a Helio-centric theory wherein the Sun is the center of our solar system and planets revolve around the Sun. This model not only debunked most of the complications in Geo-centric theory, it also paved more understanding of the other proceedings in the solar system, which could not be substantiated using Geo0-centric theory.
Another noted example to demonstrate the latter involves the evolution of species as explained by Darwin, Charles. During a bried period of time people believed that there was no hierrarchy to life as it is and it was all believed to be a superstitious development by nature. This theory was then ruled out by Darwin after a continous research on variety of species. This theory explains how an organism evolves to different styles and adaptive measures thus providing insights to the complexities of organisms and the mysteries involved in their classifications. Thus previously recorded knowledge combined with the existing knowledge paved way to understanding this mystery which provides a newer concept of "survival of the fittest" which is agreed by most of the scientists which do not come as a mystery any more.
Final example in my claim would include an unexplored field of study that has caught exemplary attention "Universe". From times immemorial many scientists have tried to understand the extravagant changes and happenings in the universe, where in till date it is still a mystery for us as to how some of these phenomenon occur. Consider two stars revolving around a black space, certain astronomers believed that it is some natural phenomenon that occurs which provides unreliable data to explain. But this mystery was then overuled by scientists after studying years of data that a gravity which is in that pirticular area is attracting those stars to revolve around it, stating what we now call as a black hole. This thoery was then identified by linking the broken chains of infrared measuremen study and dissipation of heat from an object that is nothing.
Thus to conclude my view, as we acquire more knowledge things do not become comprehensible and presents itself with more complexities and mysterious only until a time occurs wherein a remarkable explaination debunks this mystery and provide more insights to our insights and knowledge base. Until then the then acquired knowledge remains a mystery
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...' intro: true to a certain point , but fundementals do matter and there is...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...earning previously acquired knowledge. To demonstrate this with an example, con...
^^^^
Line 10, column 638, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tem and planets revolve around the Sun. This model not only debunked most of the com...
^^^^
Line 12, column 132, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ined by Darwin, Charles. During a bried period of time people believed that there was no hierr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 566, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ries involved in their classifications. Thus previously recorded knowledge combined ...
^^^^
Line 14, column 314, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this phenomenon' or 'these phenomena', 'these phenomenons'?
Suggestion: this phenomenon; these phenomena; these phenomenons
...till a mystery for us as to how some of these phenomenon occur. Consider two stars revolving aro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...eat from an object that is nothing. Thus to conclude my view, as we acquire more...
^^^^
Line 16, column 293, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Until” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hts to our insights and knowledge base. Until then the then acquired knowledge remain...
^^^^^
Line 16, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hen acquired knowledge remains a mystery
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, regarding, so, still, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3031.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 566.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35512367491 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10927591475 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468197879859 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 942.3 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.327619703 60.3974514979 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.294117647 118.986275619 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2941176471 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.97078651685 181% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32218792107 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807483204083 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159309812576 0.0758088955206 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22158363007 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.313661081644 0.0667264976115 470% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 14.1392134831 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 48.8420337079 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 100.480337079 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 11.8971910112 496% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 59.0 11.7820224719 501% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.