The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030
The line graph compares four different areas in terms of using oil between 2009 and 2030, measured in millions of barrels per day.
Overall, it is clear that oil consumption in the US and also in Western Europe/Japan is predicted to decrease over the period shown, in contrast to the expected increase in China and the Middle East. The US will remain the major consumer throughout the period
From 2009 to 2015, the number of barrels of oil consumed daily in the US totaled almost 10 million. However, the consumption decreased to over 9 million barrels in 2016 and is predicted to steadily fall to slightly over 4 million barrels in 2030. Western Europe and Japan also witness an anticipated reduction in consuming oil from below 4 million barrels per day in 2009 to over 2 millions barrels in 2030.
In contrast, two other consumers see a predicted growth in the amount of oil used daily from 2016. At the similar figure of slightly under 2 million barrels per day in 2009, daily oil consumption in China and the Middle East is expected to rise to over 3 million barrels and around 3 million barrels respectively in 2030.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the major consumer throughout the period From 2009 to 2015, the number of barrels...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73232323232 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57447482418 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489898989899 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.3842016821 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230041677964 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134231980074 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778396586256 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154481599498 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613941987796 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.