Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y

There are lots of immediate problems that have a imitate relationship with people waiting for being solved by government. For example, education is the first emergency thing for government to solve. There also have so many students who don’t have a school to study or cannot afford tuition. Social welfare is the second emergency thing for government to solve that a well social welfare makes people happy and promote social progress. Medical treatment should be the third emergency thing to solve. Lots of people cannot get a good treatment because of high treatment cost or lacking of brilliant treatment. These emergency things are all waiting for to be solved that government should focus more on these things.

The statement linking with immediate problems of today is really important for people. However, what should people do if there don’t have enough water? What should people do if temperature is higher and higher day after day? Immediate problems of today represents people’s today while anticipated problems of future represents people’s future that is equally important for people. Such as maybe there will be lack of water one day. Because water is finite in the earth but with population rising would needs more consummation. If people don’t have a commonsense to save water, water will be less and less.

Additional, water is polluting, air is polluting and soil is polluting. Immediate problems of today represents more people’s current interest that many potential problems should be ignored. To satisfy people’s interest, lots of woods produces tables, chairs, beds or papers that leads to people cannot fight with sandstorms. With the development of industry technology, more and more carbon dioxide is releasing in the air because more and more forests are missing. People’s consummation is rising that means produce more rubbishes, which is thrown everywhere because people never care about the future that leads to water is polluted. Besides, more and more rarely fishes die out, and ocean area is getting smaller and smaller as to people throw lots of rubbishes into ocean in some place.

No matter immediate problems of today or anticipated problems of the future, they all play an important role in people’s lives. Such as in the 90s last century, government do their best to develop industry to chase economy in China that satisfies people’s interest in that moment. While, because of lacking of considering anticipated problems of the future, in nowadays Beijing is suffering by serious pollution. So, people should pay equal attention on immediate problems of today and anticipated problems of the future.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...re lots of immediate problems that have a imitate relationship with people waitin...
^
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...re lots of immediate problems that have a imitate relationship with people waiting for be...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'need'
Suggestion: need
... earth but with population rising would needs more consummation. If people don't...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...ing anticipated problems of the future, in nowadays Beijing is suffering by serious polluti...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, third, well, while, as to, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3679245283 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80824828941 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474056603774 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5575204872 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.8333333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190151333769 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670416857868 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754712379513 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132523297678 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596493696049 0.0667264976115 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.