The statement "A nation should require all of its student to study the same national curriculum until they enter college" depends on a great variety of things. While there are pros such as easy evaluation of student's progress and the fact that every school student knows almost the same number of subjects, there are cons which depresses the statement above. They have been explained below.
Every student that enters school these days are entering into not only an educational world but a competitive one too. They experience failures and successes and though these shape up every student, it proves to be a tense period for them too. They are constantly compared and those who get more marks are given more praises and considered elevated in a society. This same society treats the students who don't perform well in a negligent way that makes them feel weighed down and depressed. For example, Albert Einstein was kicked out of school because he wasn't well in studying. Now, he is one of the greatest geniuses in this world. Practical knowledge must be emphasized. Just a couple of theoretical exams wouldn't bring about successions in students. The curriculum set mustn't in any way affect the mentality of students.
Another factor which is to be considered is the geographic and historic nature of each state within the nation. Knowledge about the land students are brought up in must be encouraged. The study of languages must be encouraged too. In addition to the nation's national language, the knowledge of the native language must too be encouraged if at all there is a difference. For example, in India, there are a variety of languages. Hindi is the national language and is spoke widely only in the northern part of the country. Those states whose language changes must encourage both the study of the national as well as the native language.
Likes and interests differ in students. Advancements in technology are something we all come across every day. In addition to a set of predefined set of subjects, there must be other options, subjects that are of importance in today's world that students can take up as a result of their interests. These subjects too must be given equal importance and evaluated accordingly because not everyone necessarily needs to be an Abdul Kalam or Albert Einstein. We might turn out to have an emerging Picasso somewhere nearby too!
Today is the age of completion. Parents want their children to come up in the emerging field of the present day. In satisfying their wishes, they burden the children leading them to develop a hate towards those subjects and ultimately not do well in those subjects. Now, if these students were to study an extra subject that they have an interest towards, parents would be able to understand their wishes too. Since the syllabus is a monotonous unchanging set of subject whose portions don't get changed for decades, a sense of irking gets developed. Students who normally do well might start deteriorating.
Now on the other hand, the same curriculum ensures that when all the students study the same set of subjects, we can easily evaluate the performance of students, the entire process becomes simple and easy to go through. All students are treated equally and admission criteria becomes simpler. It provides the required standard to move to the next academic year.
Therefore, a nation should require all of its student to study the same national curriculum unit but distinction on the basis of mere marks shouldn't be encouraged. Those who study, according the society, subjects of less importance shouldn't be discouraged. Why, the world's greatest chef doesn't need to excel in Science, does he?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...is same society treats the students who dont perform well in a negligent way that ma...
^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negligent way" with adverb for "negligent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eats the students who dont perform well in a negligent way that makes them feel weighed down and d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ein was kicked out of school because he wasnt well in studying. Now, he is one of the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...zed. Just a couple of theoretical exams wouldnt bring about successions in students. Th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 775, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: mustn't
...essions in students. The curriculum set mustnt in any way affect the mentality of stud...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to be'?
Suggestion: to be
...e knowledge of the native language must too be encouraged if at all there is a differe...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ncourage both the study of the national as well as the native language. Likes and inte...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 487, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nchanging set of subject whose portions dont get changed for decades, a sense of irk...
^^^^
Line 13, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... distinction on the basis of mere marks shouldnt be encouraged. Those who study, accordi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...he society, subjects of less importance shouldnt be discouraged. Why, the worlds greates...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 267, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the greatest'.
Suggestion: worlds the greatest
...tance shouldnt be discouraged. Why, the worlds greatest chef doesnt need to excel in Science, d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 288, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...couraged. Why, the worlds greatest chef doesnt need to excel in Science, does he? ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3108.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 615.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05365853659 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97987886753 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66774418048 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 215.323595506 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489430894309 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 972.0 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6754332836 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.62857142857 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223359416419 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536146736788 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712060093385 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127323055586 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888055003141 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.