The table depicts details about three important subway systems in European cities. The mentioned parameters are length of the track, number of stations in operation and number of daily passengers.
It is evident from the data that, London underground is the longest subway system in Europe featuring 408 km of total track length. Moscow metro comes second in line with 214 km of track and Paris metro is the shortest one with 214 km of track.
On the contrary, Paris metro leading in front in terms of number stations, it has got more than one station in one kilometre radious (300). London metro has 275 stations in their network whereas, Moscow metro has least number of stations(182) under it's belt.
The passenger figures are showing a completely different pattern. Moscow metro is the most crowded one serving almost 6.5 million commuters. Even though Paris has the shortest metro network among others but they comes second in terms it's passenger numbers, which is 4.5 million. London metro is only carrying 3 million passengers daily and it is the least popular metro network.
In conclusion, each metro has their own strong hold in different areas. In term of track length London metro takes the lead, whereas, Paris metro accounted for most number of stations. Passenger figures shows that Moscow metro has the upper hand in that area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the least'.
Suggestion: has the least
... in their network whereas, Moscow metro has least number of stations182 under its belt. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t number of stations182 under its belt. The passenger figures are showing a comp...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 213, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'come'
Suggestion: come
...est metro network among others but they comes second in terms its passenger numbers, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, whereas, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33535996644 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542222222222 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9835448804 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5384615385 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3076923077 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0497775857346 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290876249541 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648235065217 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0410741924902 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544105427869 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.