The supplied pie charts illustrate the percentage of various age groups people such as 0-14, 15-59 and 60 years plus in Italy and Yemen in 2000 and future forecast for 2050.
As is presented, in 2000, majority population aged 0-14 years and around 50% were in this group. While inhabitants age group 15-59 years were 46.3 percent and small proportion of population was 60 year plus and accounted around 3.6 percent. In contrast, most of people in Italy were 15-59 years and made 61.6% of total population. Around one fourth total population was 60 plus and 14.3 percent people came under 14 years age group.
The projections for 2050 suggest that in Yemen 15-59 years age group residents would increase upto 57.3 percent whereas under 14 would decline to 37 percent. However, population of 60 plus will change slightly and it will increase by 2 percent. In Italy, older population will grow to 42.3% and age group 15-59 would decline to 46.2 percent. By contrast, percentage of under 14 years will be decrease merely from 14.3 to 11.5 percent.
To conclude, people aging 60 plus will increase and 0-14 years would decrease in both countries. While 15-59 years old would be more in Yemen and less in Italy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and around 50% were in this group. While inhabitants age group 15 59 years were 4...
^^
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ounted around 3.6 percent. In contrast, most of people in Italy were 15 59 years and made 61.6...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld decline to 46.2 percent. By contrast, percentage of under 14 years will be dec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, whereas, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57142857143 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44556789121 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470046082949 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3260762638 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1818181818 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114740539757 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060110305787 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477078993684 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939894832124 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050411614757 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.