The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle number and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the number of vehicles in England and Wales from 2000 to the present and estimation for 2020. The bar chart shows how much carbon dioxide in tons emitted by four different transport methods namely car, bus, van and truck over the same period.
Overall, it can be seen that CO2 emission are expected to escalate in the future since the trend for car purchasing is continue growing till today and also expands accordingly by 2020.
Looking first at the graph, after the purchase of only 20 million vehicles had been recorded in the year of 2000 in the UK, the following 10 years witnessed a progressive increase to 35 million and is predicted to experienced a rising shift reaching around 2020 by 2020.
Regarding the bar chart, the amount of CO2 emitted by cars has always been the highest among 4 vehicles.Starting with 20 tons, its figure rose gradually through time to 22 tons in 2010 and will end up with 25 ton in 2020. Buses and vans are likely to sustain a whole 20 year period of stability at around 8 million and 15 million whereas trucks share a similar upward movement with cars but less significant, from nearly 15 million to over 20 million in the year of 2020 supposingly.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...expected to escalate in the future since the trend for car purchasing is continue...
^^
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'continued'.
Suggestion: continued
... since the trend for car purchasing is continue growing till today and also expands acc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Starting
...lways been the highest among 4 vehicles.Starting with 20 tons, its figure rose gradually...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, look, regarding, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63888888889 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56558351898 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3576753687 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.0 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 22.9334400587 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131580749275 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792426650489 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745058498866 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867596866923 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419640891191 0.0819641961636 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.32 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.